ISBCW 2016:
Canadian Cattle Welfare Research Update
Animal behaviorist highlights what research is telling us with regard to pain assessment and mitigation.
by Troy Smith, field editor
MANHATTAN, Kan. (June 9, 2016) — Understanding better the pain animals may experience and how best to provide relief are the objectives of cattle welfare studies in Canada. During the 2016 International Symposium on Beef Cattle Welfare June 8-10 in Manhattan, Kan., Ed Pajor, professor of animal behavior and welfare at University of Calgary Veterinary Medicine, reported on ongoing research.
“Some ranchers are not waiting for the science. More and more are going ahead with pain mitigation,” said Ed Pajor, professor of animal behavior and welfare, University of Calgary Veterinary Medicine.
Pajor said studies of how age and handling by humans influence pain assessments and mitigation are part of a five-year project involving both beef and dairy cattle. Researchers are assessing pain experienced by animals of different ages and the effects of treatment with anti-inflammatory medication (Meloxicam) administered through different methods.
“Researchers want to identify the method and age at which castration causes the least pain and stress, comparing banding versus surgical castration, by looking at various physiological and behavioral indicators,” explained Pajor. “[Researchers] also will be looking at rates of wound healing following castration with different knife incisions — scalpel versus Newberry castrator.”
Other studies are exploring pain and inflammation associated with dystocia, and relative effects of interventions. Pajor said researchers will assess whether administration of anti-inflammatory medication would be helpful to calves stressed as a result of difficult delivery.
“Also being studied is suckle reflex as an indicator of calf vigor. Preliminary data says, ‘yes,’” said Pajor, adding that, whether assisted or unassisted, a newborn calf with a weak suckle reflex exhibits less vigor and may be less likely to consume colostrum in a timely manner.
Also discussed was a survey-type benchmarking study to assess cattle producers’ opinions regarding pain management for practices such as C-section, dehorning, castration and branding. Pajor said results suggest that a majority of producers believe some degree of pain is associated with those procedures. Few cattle producers reported the use of pain mitigation for branding or castration, but more apply pain mitigation to dehorning. Increasingly, producers are seeking training from veterinarians in order to apply local anesthetic to block pain when removing horns.
Pajor said producer interest is growing, relative to pain mitigation for castration, with post-operative administration of anti-inflammatory medication being the primary method recommended by veterinarians. He called it evidence that producers are concerned about the welfare consequences of production practices.
“Some ranchers are not waiting for the science. More and more are going ahead with pain mitigation,” concluded Pajor.
Watch for additional coverage of the 2016 ISBCW on www.angus.media and in the Angus Journal and Angus Beef Bulletin. Comprehensive meeting coverage will be archived at www.api-virtuallibrary.com/meetings_other_news.html.
Editor’s Note: The articles used within this site represent a mixture of copyrights. If you would like to reprint or repost an article, you must first request permission of Angus Media by contacting the editor at 816-383-5200; 3201 Frederick Ave., Saint Joseph, MO 64506. Angus Media claims copyright to this we site as presented. We welcome educational venues and cattlemen to link to this site as a service to their audience.